Bank stocks have become a prospect amid recession fears

Bank stocks Experts estimate that major economies will either slow down or fall into a recession.

As a result, investors today are abandoning tradition in 2023, piling into major bank stocks.

Banks

Between January and late February, the Stoxx Europe 600 Banks index, consisting of 42 major European banks, climbed by 21%.

It hit a five-year high, outperforming the Euro Stoxx 600, its broader benchmark index.

Meanwhile, the KBW Bank tracks 24 of the leading US banks, and it rose by 4% in 2023, slightly outpacing the broader S&P 500.

Following the lows last fall, the two bank-specific indexes have surged.

The economy

However, the economic picture is less encouraging.

The United States and the European Union’s biggest economies are projected to grow sluggishly compared to last year.

Meanwhile, the UK output is expected to decrease.

According to former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, a sudden recession at some point is risky for the United States.

However, central banks were forced to raise interest rates following the widespread economic weakness coinciding with high inflation.

Regardless, it has been a bonus for banks, allowing them to make larger returns on loans to households and businesses as savers deposit more money into their savings accounts.

While rate hikes have anchored big banks’ stocks, fund managers and analysts said that great confidence in their ability to endure economic storms after the 2008 global financial crisis has also played a role.

“Banks are, generally speaking, much stronger, more resilient, more capable to [withstand] a recession than in the past,” said Roberto Frazzitta, the global head of banking at Bain & Company.

Interest rate increases

Last year, policymakers launched campaigns against the increasing inflation as interest rates in major economies increased.

The steep hikes followed a period of low borrowing costs that began in 2008.

The financial crisis ruined economics, prompting central banks to slash interest rates lows to incentivize spending and investment.

For more than a decade, central banks barely budged.

Investors don’t typically bet on banks in an environment where lower interest rates typically feed into lower lender returns.

Thomas Matthews, a senior markets economist at Capital Economics, said:

“[The] post-crisis period of very low interest rates was seen as very bad for bank profitability, it squeezed their margins.”

However, the rate hiking cycle from 2022, coupled with a few signs of easing up, changed investors’ calculations.

On Tuesday, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said interest rates would rise higher than anticipated.

Read also: Fitch Ratings warns of downgraded credit ratings

Returning investors

Due to the higher potential shareholders’ returns, investors have been drawn back.

For example, Ciaran Callaghan, the head of European equity research at Amundi, said the average dividend yield for European bank stocks is currently at around 7%.

According to Refinitiv data, S&P 500’s dividend yield currently stands at 2.1% while Euro Stoxx 600 is 3.3%.

Additionally, European bank stocks rose sharply in the past six months.

Thomas Matthews attributed Capital Economics’ outperformance to US peers based on how interest rates in the countries using euros are closer to zero than in the United States, which means investors have more to gain from the increasing rates.

He also noted that it could be due to Europe’s remarkable reversal of fortune.

Wholesale natural gas prices in the region hit a record high last August, but they have since tumbled to levels prior to the Ukraine war.

“Only a few months ago, people were talking about a very deep recession in Europe compared to the US,” said Matthrew.

“As those worries have unwound, European banks have done particularly well.”

Structural changes

Right now, European economies are still weak.

Whenever economic activity slows, bank stocks are challenging targets to hit due to banks’ earnings ties to borrowers’ ability to repay loans and satisfy consumers’ and businesses’ appetite for more credit.

However, unlike in 2008, banks are better positioned to endure loan defaults.

Following the global financial crisis, regulators proactively set up measures, requiring lenders to have a sizable capital cushion against future losses.

Lenders must also have enough cash (or assets that can be quickly converted) to repay depositors and other creditors.

Luc Plouvier, a senior portfolio manager at Dutch wealth management firm Van Lanschot Kempen, noted that banks underwent structural changes in the past decade.

“A lot of the regulation that’s been put in place [has] forced these banks to be more liquid, to have much more [of a] capital buffer, to take less risk,” he noted.

Silicon Valley Bank blame game commences

Silicon Valley BankThe initial shock of the SVB collapse has faded away, and the blame game has begun as people look for the guilty.

The tech industry is blaming Silicon Valley Bank CEO Greg Becker.

Many blame Becker for allowing the company to become the second-largest US financial disaster in history.

According to an alleged SVB employee, Becker publicly disclosed the bank’s financial difficulties before discreetly putting up financial backing to weather the storm.

The actions created the environment for the fear that led to people withdrawing their funds.

“That was absolutely idiotic,” said the employee. “They were being very transparent.”

“It’s the exact opposite of what you’d normally see in a scandal. But their transparency and forthright-ness did them in.”

The buildup

Greg Becker and his leadership team said last Wednesday night that they anticipated to produce $2.25 billion in cash from $21 billion in asset sales, resulting in a $1.8 billion loss.

SVB has made no firm pledges despite its best efforts.

The news shook Silicon Valley, where the bank has been a major lender to technology innovators.

Numerous business owners were terrified.

According to California regulator papers, several corporations withdrew $42 billion on Thursday, while Silicon Valley Bank’s shares fell by 60%.

As Silicon Valley Bank closed that day, it had a negative cash position of around $958 million.

“People are just shocked at how stupid the CEO is,” said the SVB employee.

“You’re in business for 40 years and you are telling me you can’t raise $2 billion privately? Get on a jet and fly to Kuwait like everyone else and give them control of one-third of the bank.”

While Silicon Valley Bank has yet to comment, CEO Greg Becker is claimed to have apologized in a video statement to employees.

“It’s with an incredibly heavy heart that I’m here to deliver this message,” said Becker.

“I can’t imagine what was going through your head and wonder, you know, about your job, your future.”

Read also: Nishad Singh of FTX pleaded guilty, apologizes for actions

Hysteria

Silicon Valley Bank officials, according to Jeff Sonnenfeld, CEO of Yale School of Management’s Chief Executive Leadership Institute (CELI), deserve to be admonished for their “tone-deaf, failed execution.”

In a joint statement, Sonnenfeld and CELI’s research director, Steven Lian, stated:

“Someone lit a match and the bank yelled, ‘Fire!’ – pulling the alarms in earnest out of genuine concern for transparency and honesty.”

Sonnenfeld and Tian said it was unnecessary to disclose the $2.25 billion unsubscribed capital offering on Wednesday night.

They noted that Silicon Valley Bank had sufficient capital in excess of regulatory requirements.

They also said that the $1.8 billion deficit was unnecessary to reveal.

The one-two blow, according to Sonnenfeld and Tian, sparked a massive frenzy, culminating in a rush to withdraw deposits.

They went on to suggest that the bank may have spaced the statements by at least one or two weeks, which would have lessened the impact.

On Sunday, President Joe Biden’s administration announced a rescue plan for Silicon Valley Bank depositors.

Biden also announced that the US government will undertake an extensive inquiry of all parties involved in the SVB catastrophe.

He released a statement saying:

“I am firmly committed to holding those responsible for this mess fully accountable and to continuing our efforts to strengthen oversight and regulation of larger banks so that we are not in this position again.”

The Fed’s involvement

According to Jeff Sonnenfeld and Steven Lian, Jerome Powell, the Chairman of the Federal Reserve and Biden’s choice to lead the Feds, and his colleagues bear some of the blame.

“There should be no mistaking that Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse was a direct result of the Fed’s persistent and excessive interest rate hike,” they wrote.

They stated that the Fed’s attempts to keep inflation under control affected two things:

  • The value of the bonds Silicon Valley Bank was relying on for capital
  • The value of the tech startups SVB catered

Silicon Valley Bank, on the other hand, had more than a year to prepare for and deal with the problems.

The anonymous SVB employee called the bank’s manipulation of its balance sheet “stupidity,” casting doubt on the CEO and CFO’s strategy.

But nevertheless, the employee, who is also a Wall Street veteran, believes the bank’s downfall was the result of mistakes and “naivety” rather than illegal activity.

“The saddest thing is that this place is Boy Scouts,” they said.

“They made mistakes, but these are not bad people.”